- NHS figures show that a total of 5,357 hospital admissions took place, last year
- It's an increase from 4,673 critical admissions in 2016 and 4,162 patients in 2015
- During 2017, potentially-fatal anaphylactic shock made-up a total of 1,768 cases
The number of people admitted to hospital after suffering a serious food allergy is rising by more than 10 per cent, every year.
Figures for NHS hospitals in England show a total of 5,357 admissions took place, last year - almost 15 every day - where the patient was made critically ill because of a reaction to their food.
That's an an increase of 684 from 4,673 in 2016, which had already increased by 511 from 4,162 in 2015.
Increasing demand: A total of 5,357 admissions took place, last year - almost 15 every day
Meanwhile, in 2014, the total number of urgent hospital admissions were 3, 967, while those for 2013 and 2012 were 3,754 and 3,435 respectively.
In 1,768 of the cases, last year, the admission was because the patient had gone into anaphylactic shock, which can have fatal consequences if not treated in time.
Allergies to food have become much more common in recent years with nuts, dairy products, eggs, wheat and fish often branded as the major culprits.
In the worst cases of food allergies, a known sufferer will carry a potentially life-saving adrenaline pen that can be used to inject them if they accidentally consume any of their known danger foods.
Food labelling has been improved in recent years so that people with a severe allergy can examine all the ingredients in an item to ensure they are safe.
Food allergies are believed to be responsible for the deaths of around ten people every year, with teenagers and people in their early 20s said to be at most risk as they make independent food choices for the first time.
Hard to swallow: In 2017, potentially-fatal anaphylactic shock made-up a total of 1,768 cases
In the last six years the number of people admitted to hospital suffering a severe anaphylactic shock as a result of food has risen from 1,258 to last year's figure of 1,768, a rise of 41 percent.
For less severe food reactions the number of admissions has risen 65percent in six years from 2,177 to last year's tally of 3,589.
The cost of providing DIY adrenalin shots, such as epi-pens, to people who suffer from severe allergies has now risen to £18million-per-year.
In 2016 restaurant owner Mohammed Zaman, 54, was jailed for six years for the manslaughter of takeaway customer Paul Wilson, 38.
Mr Zaman was said to have a 'cavalier attitude' to safety and had substituted a ground nut mix containing peanuts in some of the restaurant's food.
Mr Wilson, who had an allergy to nuts, stated 'no nuts' when he ordered his food from the Indian Garden, in Easingwold, North Yorkshire.
The court heard that a week before the death trading standards officers had warned Zaman about the risks of using cheaper nut-based products which could trigger allergic reactions in customers.
Earlier this year an inquest heard how university student Shahida Shadid, 18, who had a dairy allergy, collapsed and died on a night out after eating a chicken burger that had been marinated in butter milk.
A friend administered her epi-pen to combat the reaction but Shahida, a student at Manchester University, died in hospital three days after eating the meal with friends at Almost Famous, in the city.
A spokesman for the Food Standards Agency (FSA), said: 'The Food Standards Agency's objective is to ensure the availability of safe food for consumers living with food allergies, intolerance and coeliac disease.
'This is achieved through a range of activities, such as developing guidance documents for food business operators, retail, food establishments and consumers. These are aimed at advising and protecting food allergic individuals and helping them make informed choices about the foods they buy and eat.
'The FSA also works closely with local authorities who are instrumental in enforcing allergen rules compliance in food business. We also have an active food allergy research programme that underpins our work as an evidence-based organisation.'
No comments:
Post a Comment